Category:

Venture Capital

“JOBS” Law Has HUGE Impact for Entrepreneurs

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/jobs-law-has-huge-impact-for-entrepreneurs/

Last week both houses of Congress passed the JOBS Act (JOBS stands for “Jumpstart our Business Startups”).  The law, making it easier to raise up to $1million from a larger pool of investors, garnered bipartisan support, passing the House 380-41 and the Senate 73-26 (all votes against were Democratic). President Obama indicated that he plans to sign the law on today, with Eric Cantor (a major sponsor) in attendance. 

The law will create very few jobs, the name is purely political, but has huge implications for entrepreneurial funding.  I think what excites me the most is that from now the excuse “I can’t find funding” is mute!  Funding is now so much easier to get, maybe too easy!  Can we say “invitation to fraud”?  And “You got funding for that?”

The big change is the formalization and government blessing for crowdfunding.  Crowdfunding opens startup investing to almost all individuals (is that good I wonder? The Hope Scholarship here in Georgia makes college much easier for all, and has hurt education I would argue!) and gives young companies more funding opportunities.  Companies can sell securities to non-accredited investors using the various crowdfunding platforms.  Websites such as Indiegogo.com, Kiva.com, and Kickstarter.com allow entrepreneurs to post business plans for thousands to read and possibly invest.  Instead of fighting to get meeting with pretentious venture capitalists and angels, entrepreneurs can get capital from willing small investors just by posting online.  Individuals making less than $40,000 a year will only be able to invest 2 percent of their annual income in startups. Those earning more than $100,000 can invest up to 5 percent.

The biggest change perhaps is the so-called 500 rule.  It becomes the 2,000 rule, meaning that certain SEC reporting is delayed until the company has 2,000 shareholders.  This extra room allows companies to sell shares to 1,500 extra people, the crowd.

For more advanced companies, they have greater flexibility in filing to enter the public markets, hopefully making it easier to IPO.  By allowing general solicitation, companies raising money will operate under new rules, which should make it easier.  But like the rest of the bill, the final implementation lies up to the rule-writing SEC.  Some VCs opposed this easing, arguing that going public is supposed to be hard.

The effect of all this?  Some crappy companies will get funded for sure. Fraud will go up, and the cheated will be the poorest, even though they are supposedly protected. The number of jobs will certainly NOT go up.  Nothing in the bill does that.

This is the most important aspect: funding should become much, much easier, even for bad ideas.  I predict that for awhile, 2-3 years, this sort of investing will be cool, in vogue.  Crappy ideas will get funded.  Everyone should list their young companies and see how much money they can get off the table.  Reduce risk, see how much Kickstarter money you can get.  I plan to.

Indian Funding Landscape and Congrats to Ayush!

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/indian-funding-landscape-and-congrats-to-ayush/

I wanted to reflect some more on my recent trip to India. In particular, I would like to share with you the things I learned about the Indian angel and venture capital community from a panel of experts that spoke at the IIT eSummit in Mumbai two weeks ago. The panel included Indranil Deb of Mobius Strip Capital, Pranav Bhuta of Guggenheim Partners Private Equity, and Taranjit Jaiswal of BoA.  The following list is taken from the comments they made….

  • the biggest problem is that successful Indian entrepreneur does not reinvest in India,
  • the US system is 10 times older, only 4-5 years old in India,
  • US education system promotes entrepreneurship better, especially in research, innovation,
  • there is a innovation bottleneck in India,
  • best time ever to raise money is now and its easier than ever before
  • In the last 24 months, many Indians are starting to come home to invest in India and the slow US economy is  drives money back to India,
  • VCs looking for non-tech entrepreneurship, it  was financial services 10 years ago,
  • tech entrepreneurship is not the only way and tech startups have fewer exits, so plan for exit from beginning!
  • there are significant regulatory issues here and government is not helping enough, the incubators are not good, there are tax issues here  (investments not tax free is in UK),
  • it takes 45 days to set up a company in India, versus 2 days in China,
  • there are 10,000 people worth $100m, mostly in real estate, but its not doing as well now, so people moving into other areas,
  • bottlenecks to innovation include needing different enablers at different points such as accelerators and incubators, 50-100 incubators are needed still,
  • Indians need inspiration by a “go to moon” type national project,
  • Tata mentioned several times as not doing enough,
  • back people not ideas,
  • most business plans have an extremely poor idea of competition,
  • and most have not actually gotten real customer feedback,
  • entrepreneurs must create the value differentiation, as most are very poorly articulated,
  • India biggest challenge is distribution and biggest potential,
  • most important question is how will you get the first 100 customers?  and how will you keep them loyal?
  • looking for billion dollar ideas, not million dollar ideas,And my favorite, and I have never heard this anywhere else, so I am not sure it is true, but I hope it is…
  • over the life of the whole VC industry (50 years), all VCs are a net loss!!

Jim Beach of School for Startups at eSummit Jim Beach of School for Startups at eSummit

And I wanted to congratulate Ayush Agrawal, my friend at IIT.  He was selected a co-chair for the eSummit next year, a huge honor!!  See a horrible pic of the ’12 team below.  This picture proves your iPhone camera is not worth using…..

Jim Beach of School for Startups with eSummit leadership team

How a Venture Capitalist Determines Price

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/how-a-venture-capitalist-determines-price/

Ran across a great post here from a NYC venture capitalist.  It decribes the process they use to calculate how much they will offer to one of their portfolio firms.  It is a portfolio firm, meaning they have already invested in the frim startup once, and this is a subsequent investment.

Interestingly, the dilution by the founders is not mentkion or apparently an issue.  This will be at least their second round, so I figure by now they own about 10-30% of the company.

The firm alluded to in the post, the real name, is i

GUEST post: Emily Jones

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/guest-post-emily-jones/

Venture-Debt Financing Is Not Against Entrepreneurs

Usually, to raise capital, entrepreneurs offer investors preferred stocks in their fresh ventures. Preferred stocks terms always have powerful
shield for investors, and in the end, the company incur no debt.

Venture debt is another form of financing companies. Here, investors lend the money to the company instead of buying an ownership.

For instance, UTFC Financing Solutions LLC, a Utah based venture debt firm, lends entrepreneurs. Here, UTFC reserves the right to purchase a
portion of the firm at any time.

Many critics see such provisions as ‘backward’ and ‘anti-entrepreneur’. However, many critics provide sufficient grounds why early-stage debt may be a ‘preferred’ option.

If we compare in a standard investment scenario, we will see that the use of venture debt over equity decreases by 10 percent the value of the
company the entrepreneur has to give to investors. It could be even $1.5 million just through a single round. Now, if the firm becomes successful, the
millions of dollars that the founder profits, keeps or share with his employees. This is certainly positive for the entrepreneurs.

But, why an investor should do a debt deal if it is positive to the entrepreneur. They would do as they get more of the company. Again, why
debt investors give up the percentage? Actually, here they get reduced risk and priority over equity investors.

However, many critics say, this does not work in the end-especially not with tech companies. It has seen that many tech companies have
been blessed by venture debt.

Actually, each situation is different. Preferred stocks might be right sometimes. However, venture debt is also another way to tread on.

Emily Jones is a contributory guest columnist for various websites and communities including Oak View Law Group and CMFA . She has completed her Graduation in Finance and is currently working with an Investment company located in California. She has written some great articles on topics like bankruptcy, investment opportunities, debt management,  debt settlement programs and more.

Alternative Startup Funding Options

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/alternative-startup-funding-options/

This morning’s Wall Street Journal included a great article about peer-to-peer loans to get your business up and running. Entrepreneurs who have had trouble obtaining loans from banks and other lending services are finding that peer-to-peer websites offer the loans they need. And the terms can be quite appealing to investors as well. Since the risk is spread over a number of investors, these investors have the chance for a nice return on their money with mitigated risk.

You can read the full article here.

Have a new venture? Need VCs to look at your ideas?

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/have-a-new-venture-need-vcs-to-look-at-your-ideas/

During an conference in San Francisco, http://www.leanlaunchlab.com/ was the center of the attention. So far there are 5 VCs that have signed on to fund companies that uses the website. It is a website there you blog/track your company weekly. Where you upload photo, videos, and notes on what you are doing with the company.

The Venture Capitalists include Mohr Davidow Ventures, Menlo Ventures, Floodgate Fund, Guild Investment, and Inventures Group

So what are you waiting for? Get started!

Internet Bubble 2?

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/internet-bubble-2/

Today, the Financial Times reported on the exploding values of several net firms, raising the question, “Are we entering another internet bubble?”  No, we are not, but we are seeing runaway stupidity again!  And, as always the center of the stupidity is Twitter.

Zynga, a gaming company that sells virtual goods to people playing online games, has revenues approaching $2.5-3 billion.  recently it was valued at $5 billion in a private transaction, and is trying to raise another round of funds at a $9 billion valuation.  I think anyone that buys anything “virtual” is beyond a moron.  For example, people buy imaginary, non-existent fertilizer to make their plants grow faster on FarmVille, a Facebook game.  Morons.

Zynga, Facebook, and Groupon all make sense.  I see it.  The valuations are stupid high, but they will produce revenue to justify it, especially Groupon, which I think is by far the best of the group.  But $8 billion for Twitter with maybe $100 million in revenue?  Only the morons dumb enough to Twitter would invest at that ratio.  I don’t care if its a category killer, its still stupid.

Venture Capital Report 2010 Q2

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/venture-capital-report-2010-q2/

According to CB Insights, Venture Capital (VC) investments remained constant at $5.9 billion from Q1 to Q2 of 2010.  However, the number of deals dropped dramatically from 731 deals to 612, meaning VC funds per deal went from an average of roughly $8 million in Q1 to $9.6 million in Q2.

These numbers contrast slightly with those put out by VentureSource, a News Corp. company.  In taking Q1 & Q2 numbers from CB Insights, we arrive at $11.8 billion for the first half of the year.  VentureSource places VC funds for the first half of 2010 at $12.41 billion.  They also show the number of deals in Q2 at 744 compared to CB Insights’ 612.

Here are some more interesting tidbits taken from CB Insights and VentureSource:

  • 70% of deals and 65% of VC funding in Q2 occurred within 3 USA states – California, New York, and Massachusetts.
    • California accounted for over 50% of Q2 total USA funding.
    • Massachusetts has continued to increase VC funds and deals with healthcare-related funds being a major source of this increase.  Makes sense since Massachusetts recently signed their own health bill.
  • First half VC funding in 2010 is up from 2009, but has not caught up with averages from 2006 – 2008.
  • Medical-related and internet-related companies received the most funding.
  • 18% of VC funding and 42% of VC deals went to early stage companies.

Read the full CB Insights report here.

2010 Entrepreneurship Outlook

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/2010-entrepreneurship-outlook/

2010 will be the Year of the Bootstrapper.  It will be the year of the Entrepreneur who can figure out how to do the most with the least.

2009 was a bad year for entrepreneurs.  Most predictions for 2010 show a slight improvement in conditions and funding, but still, a difficult time to start a business.  But we at The Entrepreneur School believe that now is as good a time as any to start your business.

The Wall Street Journal had a great article this morning covering the different funding avenues available for Start-ups:

Angel Investors
Angel funds fell by 30% in the 1st half of 2009.  Predictions are that Angel funds will stay flat in 2010.  An interesting fact about angel funds is that even though the total dollar amount invested has decreased, the number of start-ups funded has increased.  Fewer dollars for more entrepreneurs.  The bootstrappers will win.

Venture Capital
Average deal size in the 1st half of 2009 was $5.7 million compared to $7.5 million + average from 2005 – 2008.  Venture Capitalists are saving their money for companies in the late stages of development or are giving more funds to companies already in their current portfolios.  Bootstrappers will be a step ahead by not having to wait on the dwindling number of venture funds to come through and will also retain more of their company.

SBA Loans
Less than 45,000 SBA loans were approved from Sept ’08 – Sept ’09, which is 36% lower than the year before.  Right now, SBA loans only make up 1% of start-up lending.  This is expected to increase to 5 – 10% in the near future due to the government’s stimulus packages.

The end of the article describes how Babson College, which is one of the elite entrepreneurship universities in the world, estimates that the average entrepreneur needs $65,000 to get their business up and running.  In this economy, with savings accounts, nest eggs, and house values in disarray, it will be difficult for most entrepreneurs to come up with $65,000.

We at The Entrepreneur School teach ways to start businesses for much less than $65,000.  There are a number of businesses that can be started where Bootstrapping is considered for each aspect of the business.  One of Babson’s professors, Dr. Zacharakis states this in another way:

“Instead of capital infusions, there might be a lot more exchanges of services or trading favors.”

Take a look at the first set of entrepreneurship lessons at The Entrepreneur School.

All info and statistics for this blog post were gathered from The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, January 5th, 2010.

Venture Capital Report

http://www.schoolforstartups.com/venture-capital-report/

The Wall Street Journal recently reported on Venture Capital (VC) trends for 2009 compared to the last few years.  As expected, numbers are down quite a bit this year but VC trends for 2010 are looking strong.

Here is a breakdown in the numbers reported by the WSJ & VentureSource:

Venture Capital Investments 2009 through 3rd Quarter:
- 2009 – $14.6 billion (down 41%)
- 2008 – $25 billion (down 19%)
- 2007 – $31 billion

Funds raised through IPOs by companies backed by Venture Capital:
- 2009 – $683.4 million (up 24%)
- 2008 – $550.6 million (down 92%)
- 2007 – $6.8 billion

Funds raised through Mergers & Acquisitions by companies backed by Venture Capital:
- 2009 – $9.1 billion (down 56%)
- 2008 – $20.5 billion

The Wall Street Journal predicted these sectors to expected growth and opportunity for Venture Capital in 2010 – social networking technology, mobile technologies, health care technology, and clean technology.